I consulted with the Co-Commishes on this list of things to discuss. Please comment on all the items in an organized fashion so we can keep track of the conversation. If you have any additional topics of conversation you want to bring up, this is the thread to do that!
Let's talk through the points together and when we feel like there has been enough conversation, we will bring this all to the courthouse for a vote.
Without further ado, the topics of conversation:
#1. Should we add a shots of goal (SOG) category for next season? If so, how many points?
#2. Should we add a plus/minus (+/-) category for next season? If so, how many points?
#3. Should we reward goalies for overtime and/or shootout losses? If so, how many points?
#4. Are there other stat categories that we want to add or subtract for next season?
#5. Do we want to start the playoffs one week earlier so the championship matchup does not take place during the last week of the season?
1. I think YES. I don't think it should be worth much though. Maybe .1 or .2 points max.
2. I also think YES. I know that people don't like this stat, but I do think it's apart of the game. Unitl the NHL does away with it, I think we should use it. I think it should only be worth .1 or .2 points though.
3. I also think YES, but only if they lose in a Shootout. I'd want a shootout loss to be worth .5, 1, or 1.5 points.
4. Can't think of anything.
5. I agree with starting the playoffs one week earlier so the champsionship matchup isn't the last week of the season. Juuso and I had a great matchup, but we both had top tier players sitting on our final day. This would get rid of that problem. The con of this is, the regular season ends one week earlier. But I think it's still worth it.
I consulted with the Co-Commishes on this list of things to discuss. Please comment on all the items in an organized fashion so we can keep track of the conversation. If you have any additional topics of conversation you want to bring up, this is the thread to do that!
Let's talk through the points together and when we feel like there has been enough conversation, we will bring this all to the courthouse for a vote.
Without further ado, the topics of conversation:
#1. Should we add a shots of goal (SOG) category for next season? If so, how many points?
#2. Should we add a plus/minus (+/-) category for next season? If so, how many points?
#3. Should we reward goalies for overtime and/or shootout losses? If so, how many points?
#4. Are there other stat categories that we want to add or subtract for next season?
#5. Do we want to start the playoffs one week earlier so the championship matchup does not take place during the last week of the season?
Please comment below in an orderly fashion!
1. I'm in favour of this, but we really should look at how the changes would impact the various teams before implementing it since I think this would be a very large difference maker.
2. I'm not a fan, so I vote no.
3. No, I think OTW is sufficient.
4. What about takeaways, giveaways and even better, penalties drawn?
5. I can see the merit here, however after looking at this season, it felt short enough as it is. Reducing that by a week isn't ideal to me.
Post by NJD (Chloe) on Apr 11, 2016 9:03:59 GMT -8
1. I agree with Rob, definitely make it .1 though.
2. I am not too big on +/- because you have guys like OEL who is one of the best defensemen in the league but is not on a great team and ended this season -6.
3. Yes goalies should get the reward for overtime/shootout losses, if possible you could make OT loss .5 and shootout a little more since they had to play even more minutes to get to the shootout I feel there should be a point difference.
4. Not that I can think of.
5. I feel starting the playoffs a week earlier would be beneficial, but I also feel having the finals being 2 weeks instead of 1 week allows the finals matchup to potentially be more intense.
Last Edit: Apr 11, 2016 9:06:05 GMT -8 by NJD (Chloe)
1. For sure I want sog. I would suggest they are to be worth like 0.2 points cause I think that makes the most sense (I was thinking of 0.25 and would suggest it but Id settle for 0.2)
2. Plus/ minus Id be okay with but only if it's worth is marginal (0.1 points probably)
3. I don't think shoot out points should be worth that much, but if they were to be added I'd say 0.5, or 0.75 would be alright.
4. Something I would change is lowering blocks and hits a little. At 0.3 they are worth too much imo, my change would be marginal and it would only make it go down by 0.25 or 0.5. This wouldn't change the league too much because almost everyone has an equal amount of players that would be affected both negatively and positively. I just think this would increase the value of some scorers and would lead the league in a better direction. I don't want to make drastic changes, just make marginal differences.
5. The playoffs don't really matter when they start, but I guess finishing a week earlier could be better because of the players that sit during the championship
4. Something I would change is lowering blocks and hits a little. At 0.3 they are worth too much imo, my change would be marginal and it would only make it go down by 0.25 or 0.5. This wouldn't change the league too much because almost everyone has an equal amount of players that would be affected both negatively and positively. I just think this would increase the value of some scorers and would lead the league in a better direction. I don't want to make drastic changes, just make marginal differences.
My only worry about lowering this is that, guys like Derek Dorrsett,Cody McLeod, Cal Clutterbuck, have a lot of their value come from hits and blocks, reducing that number would make some of these guys who are arguably better than the free agent pool now most likely at best a top free agent pool player who people add and drop throughout the season. To me reducing the points for those categories just makes a lot of players who have fantasy value the way we have things set up lose their value and hurt more than just the teams but the free agent pool of players (for the lesser guys who survive on hits and blocks too).
My first up overall opinion is changing rules in a dynasty is really tricky. The people who were able to draft their initial team did it with the scoring categories in mind and changing those categories can really change someones plans.
My opinions are without actually taking the value of my players in mind in order to try and be impartial, but I will likely follow this post up with research into the impacts on my own team. With that said...
#1. Should we add a shots of goal (SOG) category for next season? If so, how many points?
I like the idea of it, and I think a lot of the top players will still remain on the top as they tend to shoot a lot but if we do change it I agree that it should be very low - 0.1
#2. Should we add a plus/minus (+/-) category for next season? If so, how many points?
I have a personal hatred for this stat because it says more about the team than the player, so I'd prefer we didn't have it.
#3. Should we reward goalies for overtime and/or shootout losses? If so, how many points?
I like the idea of rewarding OT/shoot out time since it is extra time played for a goalie, and often really difficult extra time.
#4. Are there other stat categories that we want to add or subtract for next season?
Not really.
#5. Do we want to start the playoffs one week earlier so the championship matchup does not take place during the last week of the season?
My initial thought was, I don't really care but I think that removing the issue of players being rested in the last week of the playoffs has its benefit for those in the championship.
4. Something I would change is lowering blocks and hits a little. At 0.3 they are worth too much imo, my change would be marginal and it would only make it go down by 0.25 or 0.5. This wouldn't change the league too much because almost everyone has an equal amount of players that would be affected both negatively and positively. I just think this would increase the value of some scorers and would lead the league in a better direction. I don't want to make drastic changes, just make marginal differences.
My only worry about lowering this is that, guys like Derek Dorrsett,Cody McLeod, Cal Clutterbuck, have a lot of their value come from hits and blocks, reducing that number would make some of these guys who are arguably better than the free agent pool now most likely at best a top free agent pool player who people add and drop throughout the season. To me reducing the points for those categories just makes a lot of players who have fantasy value the way we have things set up lose their value and hurt more than just the teams but the free agent pool of players (for the lesser guys who survive on hits and blocks too).
I agree with Kyle's point. I initially starting writing out my dislike of PIMs as a stat but then I came to this same conclusion that in a deep league like this you need to use some of these stats to give some sort of value to the marginal, just above FA value. I think if we remove or reduce, we have to replace it with someone else to distinguish these FA guys.
One thing we should also discuss is if we should tweak any scoring values currently in place
Feel free to make a suggestion if we have one. I thought the points worked out really well. I'd love for Juuso to break down the scoring of this season like he did for pre draft at the beginning of the year. We can see how certain players ranked against one another.
So the one overall goal I think we should accomplish it to try and better align forwards and defensemen. The top 100 forward scored 21,221.8 points and 2.707 fp/g this season whereas the top 100 defensemen scored 16,995.5 with 2.2591 fp/g. Regardless of which new categories we add or which scoring we adjust, I'd ideally like to see us close that gap a bit more.
So the one overall goal I think we should accomplish it to try and better align forwards and defensemen. The top 100 forward scored 21,221.8 points and 2.707 fp/g this season whereas the top 100 defensemen scored 16,995.5 with 2.2591 fp/g. Regardless of which new categories we add or which scoring we adjust, I'd ideally like to see us close that gap a bit more.
Hmm, that's an interesting point, but .5 points isn't that big of a difference...
I think there should be a gap between forwards and Dman and this is a small gap. There are more scoring forwards than scoring D in the league which is why there is a gap in the first place. If we were to get that closer, we'd really be boosting top Dmen and probably depth Dmen that shouldn't see the same point production.
So, I think my points stands above that the gap is pretty small already. It was .5, .3, and .5 gaps for those years. It's not that big of a difference and the top 100 forwards should have more points than the top 100 Dmen.
So the one overall goal I think we should accomplish it to try and better align forwards and defensemen. The top 100 forward scored 21,221.8 points and 2.707 fp/g this season whereas the top 100 defensemen scored 16,995.5 with 2.2591 fp/g. Regardless of which new categories we add or which scoring we adjust, I'd ideally like to see us close that gap a bit more.
Hmm, that's an interesting point, but .5 points isn't that big of a difference...
I think there should be a gap between forwards and Dman and this is a small gap. There are more scoring forwards than scoring D in the league which is why there is a gap in the first place. If we were to get that closer, we'd really be boosting top Dmen and probably depth Dmen that shouldn't see the same point production.
Why do you say that? If I know on average, forwards are worth more than defensemen, I may try and stack my team in all forwards, forgetting defence. This creates an unbalanced system. I don't know why we'd want to have this sort of gap.
Personally, I'm in favour of boosting defensemen to above the value of forwards given the gap in total points to help balance things. We're such a deep league, creating this balance I think is really key.
Last Edit: Apr 11, 2016 10:08:21 GMT -8 by NYR (Rob)
Hmm, that's an interesting point, but .5 points isn't that big of a difference...
I think there should be a gap between forwards and Dman and this is a small gap. There are more scoring forwards than scoring D in the league which is why there is a gap in the first place. If we were to get that closer, we'd really be boosting top Dmen and probably depth Dmen that shouldn't see the same point production.
Why do you say that? If I know on average, forwards are worth more than defensemen, I may try and stack my team in all forwards, forgetting defence. This creates an unbalanced system. I don't know why we'd want to have this sort of gap.
Personally, I'm in favour of boosting defensemen to above the value of forwards given the gap in total points to help balance things. We're such a deep league, creating this balance I think is really key.
To note, let's look at the players who are 90 - 100 at each position this year.
Forwards:
90. Alexander Steen 91. Tom Wilson 92. Jarome Iginla 93. Jakub Voracek 94. Cam Atkinson 95. Nathan Mackinnon 96. Jamie Mcginn 97. Tomas Plekanec 98. Evander Kane 99. Derek Stepan 100. Charlie Coyle
Defense:
90. John-Michael Liles 91. Brian Campbell 92. Trevor Daley 93. Josh Manson 94. Danny Dekeyser 95. Ron Hainsey 96. Darnell Nurse 97. Adam McQuaid 98. Ian Cole 99. Marco Scandella 100. Jake McCabe
If you look at the quality of players, those forwards are naturally more talented than those defensemen. It's not about making forwards more valuable than Defense. In fact I think that it's pretty even already. But if we try and balance out the top 100 to be closer, we are going to all of a sudden make players like Danny Dekeyser be as vauable as players like Derek Stepan, which clearly is not accurate.
So when looking at the gap, it makes sense to me there is a gap. .5 is pretty small all things considered too.
If we try and fix it not only are the Dekeyser's going to be as valauble as the Stepan's, but all of a suden Burns, Karlsson, Klingberg, etc. are going to be too powerful.
Post by NYI (Nick) on Apr 11, 2016 10:09:15 GMT -8
Well before I join in any of these further discussions I will talk about the first 5 points:
1) Yes. We should have a SOG scoring category. I agree that it shouldn't be more than .2, but that is a topic to have a vote on.
2) I am in favor of a +/-, if it is the lowest scoring category. .1 points maybe. At that point I am not even sure if it's worth using. Not to passionate or caring here.
3) I think it is a good idea to reward Goalies for extra time. .5 points maybe. NHL teams are rewarded for OTL, so why not our goalies? We are also adding a few points for skaters with SOG, +/-, and potentially others, so this will help keep goalies in line.
4) Takeaways/Giveaways are something we should discuss. Still not sure how I feel about it. I believe it would be a good idea to look into the points awarded for blocked shots, hits, and maybe even PIM. I think blocked shots should be discussed especially.
5) I like the idea of the final game having all of the teams best players but I don't think we should be cutting the season too short. I would leave it as is, or find another solution.
Why do you say that? If I know on average, forwards are worth more than defensemen, I may try and stack my team in all forwards, forgetting defence. This creates an unbalanced system. I don't know why we'd want to have this sort of gap.
Personally, I'm in favour of boosting defensemen to above the value of forwards given the gap in total points to help balance things. We're such a deep league, creating this balance I think is really key.
To note, let's look at the players who are 90 - 100 at each position this year.
Forwards:
90. Alexander Steen 91. Tom Wilson 92. Jarome Iginla 93. Jakub Voracek 94. Cam Atkinson 95. Nathan Mackinnon 96. Jamie Mcginn 97. Tomas Plekanec 98. Evander Kane 99. Derek Stepan 100. Charlie Coyle
Defense:
90. John-Michael Liles 91. Brian Campbell 92. Trevor Daley 93. Josh Manson 94. Danny Dekeyser 95. Ron Hainsey 96. Darnell Nurse 97. Adam McQuaid 98. Ian Cole 99. Marco Scandella 100. Jake McCabe
If you look at the quality of players, those forwards are naturally more talented than those defensemen. It's not about making forwards more valuable than Defense. In fact I think that it's pretty even already. But if we try and balance out the top 100 to be closer, we are going to all of a sudden make players like Danny Dekeyser be as vauable as players like Derek Stepan, which clearly is not accurate.
So when looking at the gap, it makes sense to me there is a gap. .5 is pretty small all things considered too.
If we try and fix it not only are the Dekeyser's going to be as valauble as the Stepan's, but all of a suden Burns, Karlsson, Klingberg, etc. are going to be too powerful.
I get that which is why I'm not outright suggesting we change the values, but rather consider the gap when we're making other changes, ESPECIALLY SOG which will benefits forwards far more than defensemen.
I get that which is why I'm not outright suggesting we change the values, but rather consider the gap when we're making other changes, ESPECIALLY SOG which will benefits forwards far more than defensemen.
I gotcha. SOG will defintiely help forwards more and maybe expand that gap. I don't think SOG should be more than .1 points though.
Could potentially increase BLKS by .1 points to help balance that out.
Before changing values of anything, or we vote on anything, I'd like Juuso to create that doc like he did pre draft. That was very helpful when thinking about what stats should be worht what. Especially since our balance is pretty solid to start with
1. SOG Yes 0.1 for F and 0.2 for D if possible to help keep them balanced 2. I'm ok with either, but I think making it 0.1 is pointless. It will be at most 5 points in either direction over the course of a season. 0.2 would be better imo 3. I think .5 for an OT or SO loss is good 4. I really like the idea of giveaways and takeaways. I think they should be -0.2 and 0.2 respectively similar to plus/minus 5. I say no, our league is deep enough where one or two players sitting out isn't going to ruin your whole week, plus it also has the effect of dampening the value of players on the top tier teams who are more likely to sit out so it makes it less advantageous to stack your team with players from top teams.
Last Edit: Apr 11, 2016 11:05:13 GMT -8 by ANA (Ian)
1. Yes, I think this is important. But I think around .2 - .3 2. Hell no. 3. Yes. a loss in OT or shootout should give you .5 - 1 point. 4. Giveaway and takeaways would be very nice. Around .2 +/- 5. I say yes. If you are running to the finals your team usually has a few stars and if you do have a few there is a chance that they will be rested. I think winning this league is a cool accomplishment and takes a lot of work, I want my full team to be available, and have no chance of one of my stars being rested.
So the one overall goal I think we should accomplish it to try and better align forwards and defensemen. The top 100 forward scored 21,221.8 points and 2.707 fp/g this season whereas the top 100 defensemen scored 16,995.5 with 2.2591 fp/g. Regardless of which new categories we add or which scoring we adjust, I'd ideally like to see us close that gap a bit more.
Since each roster has about twice as many forwards as defensemen, shouldn't we compare the top 100 forwards with the top 50 defensemen?
I consulted with the Co-Commishes on this list of things to discuss. Please comment on all the items in an organized fashion so we can keep track of the conversation. If you have any additional topics of conversation you want to bring up, this is the thread to do that!
Let's talk through the points together and when we feel like there has been enough conversation, we will bring this all to the courthouse for a vote.
Without further ado, the topics of conversation:
#1. Should we add a shots of goal (SOG) category for next season? If so, how many points?
#2. Should we add a plus/minus (+/-) category for next season? If so, how many points?
#3. Should we reward goalies for overtime and/or shootout losses? If so, how many points?
#4. Are there other stat categories that we want to add or subtract for next season?
#5. Do we want to start the playoffs one week earlier so the championship matchup does not take place during the last week of the season?
Please comment below in an orderly fashion!
1. Yes, .1 2. No 3. This I don't understand, is this in addition to the initial win/loss? Also, don't see the point in this really, so no (on first glance) 4. None come to mind 5. Yes, and each round only last for 1 wk. 6. I would think it would be fun to have a basement trophy, for the worst team in the league (record-wise). My fantasy football league we do a golden toilet paper roll, with your logo on it. It could be something that the prior last place team could pick or it could be an official trophy.