Last place team gets the best percentage at 1st overall in entry draft. Team that just misses the playoffs, gets the worst chances at 1st overall.
Two teams will be drawn from a lottery. The 1st team selected gets 1st overall. The 2nd team selected gets 2nd overall. After that, the rest of the order fills in by standings.
Last place team gets the best percentage at 1st overall in entry draft. Team that just misses the playoffs, gets the worst chances at 1st overall.
Two teams will be drawn from a lottery. The 1st team selected gets 1st overall. The 2nd team selected gets 2nd overall. After that, the rest of the order fills in by standings.
Okay great.
So with the NHL, 8 teams from each conference make the playoffs. That's 16/30, or a little more than 50%. The lottery then allows 1 team out of the pool of 14 to win the lottery and pick 1st overall in the upcoming draft.
Why would we reduce the ratio of playoff teams from ~53% to 40% (8/20)? I'd rather go in the opposite direction giving 60% (12/20) of the teams entry into the playoff pool, leaving the worst 8 teams a chance to draft well and even win the lottery. In this scenario, I don't think 2 lottery picks would be needed either, but I could be swayed as I think that's an entirely different discussion too.
Last place team gets the best percentage at 1st overall in entry draft. Team that just misses the playoffs, gets the worst chances at 1st overall.
Two teams will be drawn from a lottery. The 1st team selected gets 1st overall. The 2nd team selected gets 2nd overall. After that, the rest of the order fills in by standings.
Okay great.
So with the NHL, 8 teams from each conference make the playoffs. That's 16/30, or a little more than 50%. The lottery then allows 1 team out of the pool of 14 to win the lottery and pick 1st overall in the upcoming draft.
Why would we reduce the ratio of playoff teams from ~53% to 40% (8/20)? I'd rather go in the opposite direction giving 60% (12/20) of the teams entry into the playoff pool, leaving the worst 8 teams a chance to draft well and even win the lottery. In this scenario, I don't think 2 lottery picks would be needed either, but I could be swayed as I think that's an entirely different discussion too.
The two lottery picks is to prevent tanking. So I think it's necessary either way.
Post by CHI (David) on Aug 12, 2015 9:36:20 GMT -8
I voted for 8 teams, but I think the 1st 3 picks should be lottery, then worst team left gets pick no. 4. I believe this is how the NHL is doing it this coming year.
I voted for 8 teams, but I think the 1st 3 picks should be lottery, then worst team left gets pick no. 4. I believe this is how the NHL is doing it this coming year.
I voted for 8 teams, but I think the 1st 3 picks should be lottery, then worst team left gets pick no. 4. I believe this is how the NHL is doing it this coming year.
This is saying a lot coming from somebody who might be towards the bottom of standings.
We can do 3 lottery picks potentially. We can vote on that, after this vote locks.
I voted for 8 teams, but I think the 1st 3 picks should be lottery, then worst team left gets pick no. 4. I believe this is how the NHL is doing it this coming year.
This is saying a lot coming from somebody who might be towards the bottom of standings.
We can do 3 lottery picks potentially. We can vote on that, after this vote locks.
I am fine either way, tbh. It will be an interesting year, and never know who is going to get hurt or what players do really well. I might be in the middle, especially if Nurse get a spot on the Oilers,